top of page

Chemical Reactivity Theory: Activation Strain Model

One of our models, the Activation Strain Model (ASM) focuses on understanding reactivity: Why is a barrier high or low? How does this depend on the electronic structure and bonding capabilities of the reactants, on their structure and rigidity and on the characteristic distortivity of a particular reaction mechanism? The ASM decomposes the relative energy of a system of reactants along the reaction energy profile [ΔE(ζ), with ζ the reaction coordinate] into two terms, namely the total strain energy of the reactants and their mutual total interaction energy: ΔE(ζ) = ΔEstrain(ζ) + ΔEint(ζ), as illustrated below for metal-mediated C–X bond-activation via oxidative addition. Here, the total strain energy, ΔEstrain(ζ), is the energy needed to deform the reactants into the geometry they adopt in the interacting complex and is affected by their rigidity. The total interaction energy, ΔEint(ζ), is the actual interaction between the deformed reactants and can be further decomposed by using KS-MO and the EDA scheme.

​

Understanding Chemical Reactivity Using the Activation Strain Model

P. Vermeeren, S. C. C. van der Lubbe, C. Fonseca Guerra, F. M. Bickelhaupt, T. A. Hamlin

Nature Protoc. 2020, 15, 649-667

 

Analyzing Reaction Rates with the Distortion/Interaction-Activation Strain Model

F. M. Bickelhaupt, K. N. Houk

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10070-10086 (Frontispiece & Cover)

 

The Activation Strain Model and Molecular Orbital Theory: Understanding and Designing Chemical Reactions

I. Fernandez, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4953-4967 (tutorial review)

Elementary Reactions

Elementary organic reactions are routinely used for the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, plastics, fuels, cosmetics, detergents, and agrochemicals, to name a few. Generating fundamental rules and frameworks to understand and predict the reactivity of reactions is essential to guide future experimental developments toward the design of more efficient catalytic transformations. In this project, we analyze the reactivity and selectivity of reactions using state-of-the-art quantum chemical methods. Using the activation strain model (ASM) of reactivity in conjunction with quantitative Kohn-Sham molecular orbital theory (KS-MO) and a matching energy decomposition analysis (EDA) we pinpoint the factors that ultimately control the reactivity. Insights emerging from these results can then directly be used by experimentalists to ultimately design novel and more efficient transformations.

 

How Oriented External Electric Fields Modulate Reactivity

S. Yu, P. Vermeeren, T. A. Hamlin, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, online (Cover)

 

A Unified Framework for Understanding Nucleophilicity and Protophilicity in the SN2/E2 Competition

P. Vermeeren, T. Hansen, P. Jansen, M. Swart, T. A. Hamlin, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 15538-15548 (Cover, issue #1000)

 

Origin of Rate Enhancement and Asynchronicity in Iminium Catalyzed Diels-Alder Reactions

P. Vermeeren, T. A. Hamlin, I. Fernandez, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 8105-8112 (Cover)

 

How Lewis Acids CatalyzeDiels-Alder Reactions

P. Vermeeren, T. A. Hamlin, I. Fernandez, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 6201-6206

Catalysis

We wish to understand how a transition-metal catalyst can be rationally designed such as to selectively activate one particular bond in a substrate. To this end, we quantum chemically analyze the activity and selectivity of various model catalysts towards different types of substrates, using the activation strain model and quantitative molecular orbital theory. Rather subtle electronic differences between bonds can be exploited to induce a lower barrier for activating one or the other, depending, among other factors, on the catalyst's electronic regime (i.e. s-regime versus d-regime catalysts).

 

Understanding the Differences Between Iron and Palladium in Cross-Coupling Reactions

X. Sun, M. V. J. Rocha, T. A. Hamlin, J. Poater, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 9651-9664 (Cover)

 

Role of Steric Attraction and Bite-Angle Flexibility in Metal-Mediated C–H Bond Activation

L. P. Wolters, R. Koekkoek, F. M. Bickelhaupt

ACS Catalysis 2015, 5, 5766-5775

 

New Concepts for Designing d10-M(L)n Catalysts: d Regime, s Regime and Intrinsic Bite-Angle Flexibility

L. P. Wolters, W. J. van Zeist, F. M. Bickelhaupt

Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 11370-11381 (Cover)

bottom of page